Analisis dinamika hubungan industrial dan dampaknya terhadap kesejahteraan karyawan: Pendekatan systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60036/jbm.1085Keywords:
Hubungan Industrial, Kesejahteraan Karyawan, PHK Sepihak, Keadilan Prosedural, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
Tujuan – Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dinamika hubungan industrial dan implikasinya terhadap kesejahteraan karyawan, serta mengaitkannya dengan fenomena pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) di Indonesia.
Desain/metodologi/pendekatan – Studi menggunakan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) berbasis pedoman PRISMA terhadap artikel terindeks Scopus periode 2020–2025, dilengkapi dengan analisis kasus empiris CNN Indonesia sebagai ilustrasi konteks lokal.
Temuan – Hubungan industrial yang dilandasi keadilan prosedural, komunikasi efektif, dan kepercayaan terbukti meningkatkan kepuasan, keterlibatan, dan retensi karyawan; sebaliknya, ketimpangan kekuasaan dan PHK sepihak menurunkan kesejahteraan secara ekonomi maupun psikologis.
Keterbatasan penelitian – Penelusuran terbatas pada tiga basis data (Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed), berbahasa Inggris, dan periode 2020–2025; analisis kasus hanya menggunakan satu unit (CNN Indonesia).
Implikasi – Perusahaan perlu memperkuat dialog sosial, menerapkan good governance, dan mengadopsi pendekatan human-centered dalam pengelolaan tenaga kerja; regulator perlu memperketat pengawasan kepatuhan terhadap prosedur PHK.
Kebaruan – Studi ini mengintegrasikan sintesis literatur global dengan fenomena empiris PHK Indonesia pasca-pandemi (2020–2025) dan menawarkan kerangka konseptual yang menempatkan kebijakan ketenagakerjaan, tata kelola, dan teknologi sebagai faktor pemoderasi hubungan industrial–kesejahteraan karyawan.
Downloads
References
Aliansi Jurnalis Independen. (2023). Putusan kasasi perkara ketenagakerjaan CNN Indonesia. AJI Indonesia.
Batmunkh, A., Fekete-Farkas, M., & Lakner, Z. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of gig economy research. Administrative Sciences, 12(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12020051
Bell, D. (2025). Work and its discontents [Senior project]. Bard Digital Commons.
Bertello, A., Ferraris, A., De Bernardi, P., & De Massis, A. (2022). Challenges to open innovation in traditional SMEs: An analysis of pre-competitive projects in university–industry–government collaboration. Journal of Small Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00727-1
Bolt, E. E. T., & Winterton, J. (2022). A century of labour turnover research: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12294
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.
Bulfone, F. (2023). Industrial policy and comparative political economy: A literature review and research agenda. Competition & Change. https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294221076225
Bulińska-Stangrecka, H., & Bagieńska, A. (2021). The role of employee relations in shaping job satisfaction as an element promoting positive mental health at work in the era of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041903
Chang, H., Ding, Q., Zhao, W., Hou, N., & Liu, W. (2023). The digital economy, industrial structure upgrading, and carbon emission intensity: Empirical evidence from China's provinces. Energy Strategy Reviews, 50, 101218.
Databoks. (2025). Angka pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) di Indonesia tahun 2025. Katadata. https://databoks.katadata.co.id
Ghani, B., Zada, M., Memon, K. R., Ullah, R., Khattak, A., & Han, H. (2022). Challenges and strategies for employee retention in the hospitality industry: A review. Sustainability, 14(5), 2885. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052885
Grosse, E. H., Sgarbossa, F., & Berlin, C. (2023). Human-centric production and logistics system design and management: Transitioning from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2246783
International Labour Organization. (2021). Working from home: From invisibility to decent work. https://www.ilo.org/publications/working-home-invisibility-decent-work
International Labour Organization. (2022). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2022. https://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/weso/trends2022
Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. (2025). Data pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) tahun 2024–2025. Kemnaker RI.
Klenert, D., Fernández-Macías, E., & Antón, J. I. (2023). Do robots really destroy jobs? Evidence from Europe. Work, Employment and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X211068891
Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. J., Bakker, A. B., & van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
Krueger, A. B., & Ashenfelter, O. (2022). Theory and evidence on employer collusion in the franchise sector. Journal of Human Resources, 57(S), S324–S353. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.57.S.S324
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
Neumark, D., & Shirley, P. (2022). Myth or measurement: What does the new minimum wage research say about minimum wages and job loss in the United States? Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12306
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Teleworking in the COVID-19 pandemic: Trends and prospects. https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/teleworking-in-the-covid-19-pandemic-trends-and-prospects-72a416b6/
Owalla, B., Gherhes, C., Vorley, T., & Brooks, C. (2022). Mapping SME productivity research: A systematic review of empirical evidence and future research agenda. Small Business Economics, 58, 1285–1307.
Padilla-Lozano, C. P., & Collazzo, P. (2022). Corporate social responsibility, green innovation and competitiveness—Causality in manufacturing. Competitiveness Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-07-2020-0087
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., & Rodgers, M. (2020). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC Methods Programme.
Rossoni, A. L., & de Vasconcellos, E. P. G. (2024). Barriers and facilitators of university–industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: A systematic review. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Reza Septian Pradana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
